The Correspondence between the Portreeve and the City Council of České Budějovice and the Portreeve and the Aldermen of Třeboň in 16th Century
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The main deal of bachelor work which is called ?The Correspondence between the Portreeve and the City Council of České Budějovice and the Portreeve and the Aldermen of Třeboň in 16th Century? is to explain the diplomatic relations between them. This is a critical edition of scientific sources important for the reconstruction of city interrelationship during the 16th century. The work is divided into three chapters. The introduction is focused primarily on approach of primary sources and literature which are used, but it also deals with present elaboration of the task of intercity correspondence. The first chapter gives a general development of the city municipality from the end of the Hussitism to the battle of White Mountain. The second chapter shows brief view into the history of city České Budějovice and dominium Třeboň particularly in the reference period of the 16th century, but it also attend to various privileges which the cities was present with. The third and last chapter is the core of the whole work. There is contained the diplomatic analysis of the own edition with indispensable editorial comment. The individual letters in full wording with head regests complemented footnotes follow after that. The conclusion is interpretation of ascertained findings. The work includes the list of used sources, literature and attachments which contain examples of particular sheets and official books.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".