MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7135823339

Astronomical research at Charles University in Prague from 1882 until the present time

2010· dissertation· cs· W7135823339 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Petra Hyklová

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature) · 2010
Typedissertation
Languagecs
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicHistory and Developments in Astronomy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGermanCzechTechnical universityState (computer science)Quarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Charles- Ferdinand University was split intu Czech and German universities in 1882. From then both parts were developing independently. Astronomical Institute of the German University was directed by eminent selenograph Ladislaus Weinek (from 1883 to 1913), Adalbert Prey (1918- 1930), Einstein's friend and the first director of the Einstein Institute in Potsdam Erwin Finlay Freundlich (1936 -1938) and Werner Schaub (1939 -1945). The German University was shut down in 1945. The Czech Astronomical Institute was found in 1887 by August Seydler. After Seydler's death the Institute was assumed by Gustav Gruss in 1892. From 1919 do 1943 Vladimir V. Heinrich was the head of the Institute, in 1953 -1967 it was Josef M. Mohr and 1970 1990 Vladimír Vanýsek. The direstors of the State Observatory, that became an independent state research institute after 1918, were František Nušl in 1920 -1938, Otto Seydl in 1938 -1948 and František Link in 1948- 1952. The State Observatory, including Ondřejov Observatory, became the Astronomical Institute of Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.107

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.012
Science and technology studies0.0060.009
Scholarly communication0.0090.007
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)Same topicHistory and Developments in AstronomyFrench-language works237,207