Bibliographic record
Abstract
Current issues in regulation of international carriage by air - Summary The purpose of my thesis is to analyze the basic questions relating to international carriage by air. This term provides a wide range of situations and possible scenarios but I have primarily focused on the liability of carriers and liability limits. Thanks to the quick progression and technological improvements to which the transportation by air of past years had to face, this issue gained very fast an international character. The air law community was forced to handle the newly born task of coming issues as soon as possible. Warsaw Convention 1929 was the first uniform instrument which offered an acceptable body of rules governing the liability of carriers in international carriage by air and became a guarantee for passengers. But because its provisions regarding the liability quit promptly did not meet the practical needs of the modern air world, additional protocols and conventions started to operate in this field as the result of those old-fashioned provisions and sometimes too much extended requirements on transport documents. The main problems of the frontier Convention were too much protective provisions of airlines. Montreal convention is the main international instrument of these days bringing certainty into the principles of...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".