Municipal books of Kadaň and administration of the town in the years 1465-1620
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Municipal books of Kadaň and administration of the town in the years 1465 - 1620 Work deals with two nearly connected topics. First topic is diplomatic description and palaeographic analysis group of 43 books that were guided by the office of royal town Kadaň. Description and analysis refer to existing research of these issues (I.1 Possibilities of studies and accesses of municipal books). Books are minutely described in chapter I.7 Index of municipal books of Kadaň from years 1465-1620. They were disposed for the first time during World War I; for next and last time fund was sequenced in years 1966-1968 (I.2 Fortunes of municipal books of Kadaň to the third quarter of 20th century). Books were divided into four groups for purposes of next processing and classification: books of municipal administration (in the strict sense of the word); indisputable civil law books; disputable civil law books and books of villages under municipal domination (I.3. Contentual fission of preserved official city registers of Kadaň). According to various written allusions it is possible to identify circa thirty lost books; this number cannot be final indeed (I.4. Deperdita). Chapter I.5. Book description is devoted to way how books were guided, numbering of folios, indexes, watermarks and origin of paper. Palaeographic...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.040 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".