Secondary metabolite production in explantate cultures of St. John's worth
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Secondary metabolite production in explantate cultures of St. John's Wort Šárka Křížová Diploma thesis Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Pharmacy in Hradec Králové, Pharmacy Key words: St. John's Wort, elicitation, flavonoids, hydrogen peroxide, glutathion, neutral red. The goal of the diploma thesis was to influence the production of secondary metabolites (flavonoids) in explantate cultures of St. John's Wort. Method of elicitation was used. This method is based on adding of an elicitor (stressor) to the tissue culture. Suspensional and callus cultures of Hypericum Perforatum L. were used for experiments with potential elicitors: hydrogen peroxide, combination of hydrogen peroxide and Mg-ATP, glutathion and cellular pigment neutral red. Their effect to the production of flavonoids was evaluated after 4 and 24 hours. Cultures were cultivated on Murashige and Skoog medium with the addition of a growth hormone BAP and a growth stimulator α-NAO. HPLC method was used for analysis of the samples. Hydrogen peroxide raised the production of flavonoids, especially in suspensional cultures, in callus cultures the highest influence had glutathion (reduced form) and neutral red. The highest production of flavonoids was reached after 24 hours by addition of hydrogen peroxide in concentration 100 mg/l,...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".