Bohemian garnet jewelry on the domestic and world scene. Družstvo umělecké výroby Granát v Turnově between 1953 - 1973.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This bachelor's thesis focuses on the activities and production of the Družstvo umělecké výroby Granát v Turnově in the period from its foundation in 1953 to the following two decades until 1973. The first part of the thesis briefly deals with the characteristics of Bohemia garnet as a mineral, its mining and the history of its use in the goldsmithing industry. This outlines the origins of Bohemia garnet jewellery and its tradition, which the cooperative closely follows. The interest is in the cooperative as a whole, i.e. its historical development as a manufacturing company and especially its jewellery production. The latter is divided into large- and small-scale production, its features and specifics are described in detail, using selected examples of realised jewellery and surviving designs. The sources of inspiration in history are demonstrated, but the aim is to highlight small-scale production that reflects period stylistic tendencies and carries a higher artistic value. Of interest are thus the jewellery exhibits presented by Czechoslovakia at the World Expo exhibitions in Brussels in 1958 and in Montreal in 1967, which influenced the shape of the Garnet designs. Not omitted is the presentation of the cooperative on the domestic and foreign scene, which is documented in the period press,...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".