Juridical institute of the guardianship council in the Civil Code of the Czech republic
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Juridical institute of the guardianship council in the Civil Code of the Czech Republic The thesis deals with the legal regulations of guardianship council under of the new Czech Civil Code. The Czech legal system has not experienced the institute of guardianship council before, which brings an uncertainty into the interpretation of the respective provisions. The aim of this thesis is to analyse the most important provisions of the legal regulation, demonstrate impact of these provisions in practice, including eventual uncertainties and eventually to suggest a solution of the problematic parts of the regulation. Due to the author's personal membership of a guardianship council is the work enriched by the personal experience from a real existence of the guardianship council. Another part of the thesis is focused on the analysis of the French legislation and legislation of the Canadian province Québec. The Czech Civil Code explanatory report directly admits the inspiration in the above mentioned codices of France and Québec. Analysis and the consecutive comparison of the above mentioned legislation with the Czech one shall bring the interpretative basis for the application of the legal regulation of the guardianship council under of the Czech Civil Code. The main output of this thesis is to...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it