MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7135892362

Czechoslovak Foreign Cultural Policy in the Early Years of Normalization

2021· dissertation· cs· W7135892362 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jan Machala

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languagecs
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCentral European national history
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExhibitionForeign policyNormalization (sociology)Ministry of Foreign AffairsPoliticsCommunismSoft powerCommissionForeign relations
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The master's thesis deals with the approach of the communist regime to the cultural promotion of the Czechoslovak Socialist Republic in developed capitalist countries, based on the analysis of selected foreign exhibitions with Czechoslovak participation. The presentation at these exhibitions was an important instrument of Czechoslovak foreign policy, which made it possible to influence the foreign public and political representation in the style of soft power. The master's thesis focuses on the form and application of this foreign-cultural policy during the early phase of the so-called normalization and examines its continuity or discontinuity in relation to the reform period of the 1960s. It focuses on the circumstances of the origin and course of the implementation of the World Exhibition in Montreal, the Man and His World exhibition, the World Exhibition in Osaka and the Czechoslovakia - a Country of Two Cultures exhibition. In addition to the above, it briefly discusses the previous development of world exhibitions. The master's thesis draws to a large extent from primary sources. In particular, the materials of the Government Commission for Exhibitions, which discussed specific forms of exhibitions, and documents of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, including reports from the relevant embassies, were...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.236

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.008
Scholarly communication0.0100.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)Same topicCentral European national historyFrench-language works237,207