MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7135894305

Danmarks mål om 70 pct. reduktion i 2030 er ikke en retfærdig fordeling af ansvaret for at begrænse temperaturstigningen til 1,5 grader

2022· other· da· W7135894305 on OpenAlexaff
Joachim Peter Tilsted, Jens Friis Lund, Anders Bjørn, Anders Blok, Charlotte Louise Jensen, Asker Voldsgaard

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) · 2022
Typeother
Languageda
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWork (physics)LicenseeContext (archaeology)Lever
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Den styrende målsætning bag de mange danske klimaaftaler gennem de sidste to år, lever ikke op til klimalovens hensigt om, at Danmark skal være et foregangsland. Målet flugter heller ikke med princippet nedfældet i Parisaftalen om fælles, men differentieret ansvar mellem verdens lande i kampen for at begrænse den globale opvarmning til 1,5 grader.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.334
Threshold uncertainty score0.950

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3340.230

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)→French-language works237,207→