Sculpture in Vienna of 3th quart of the 14th century in the Middle-European context
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The thesis discusses the most importants works of sculpture in Vienna in the 3rd quarter of the 14th century, sculpture of the "Herzogswerkstatt" in the St. Stephan's cathedral, whose commission and conception is related with the Austrian dukes Rudolf IV. (1358-1365) and Albrecht III. (1349-1395). It concerns the sculpture of the so called "Fürstenportale", two gisants on the Cenotaf of Rudolf IV. and three sovereign couples in the exterior of the church. A crucial section of the thesis is the analysis of Duke's portals. Beside questions concerning original localisation, iconography and function of the portals, the aim is to point out the genesis of the style. The last two chapters deal with Rudolf's cenotaf and sovereign couples. In contrary to recents theses of the scolars Schmidt and Schwarz I find the stylistic origins of Vienna's sculpture in the Middle-European art - the most important influence constitutes parlerian sculpture of South Germany and Prague. The main part of this group was finished during Albrecht III. reign.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".