Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis deals with the phenomenon of French-Canadian literature, the rural novel, from the point of view of the author Germaine Guèvremont. The aim of the thesis is to reveal how the literary genre helped the Quebec women to create their propre literary tradition, how they managed to open purely women topics within this specific genre and how this helped to define their identity. The first part clarifies the origin of the genre based on the nationalist ideology and the traditional values such as native land, family, and religion. These values were associated with the French-Canadian identity as well as they defined the social hierarchy which placed women into inferior position in the society. The second part examines the social status of women in Quebec at the time of the biggest popularity of the genre. In this part, women are also shown as the protagonists of the novels, as well as the bearers of the female literary tradition. The third and last part is dedicated to the analysis of Germaine Guèvremont's novels, Le Survenant and Marie- Didace. It focuses on the characteristics of the female characters as individuals, the narrative and language devices, and finally on the topics such as marriage, friendship between women and motherhood.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.023 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".