MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7135916751

A Translation of the Canadian Constitution and a Comparison of Selected Sections of the Constitution of the Czech Republic

2006· dissertation· cs· W7135916751 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
František Barták

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature) · 2006
Typedissertation
Languagecs
FieldMathematics
TopicEducation, Psychology, and Complexity Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConstitutionCzechLegislatureTheme (computing)Work (physics)Legislative history
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Several parts of Constitution of Canada and Constitution of Czech republic are compared in this work - legislative power, Charters of Rights and Freedoms and conditions for constitutional amendments. Authorial translation of Constitution of Canada (never translated to Czech before) is a part of the work. There's an introduction to the theme and a brief history of Canada and both Constitutions in the work as well. The work tries to show some legal problems of Canada to Czech people.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score0.651

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0080.017
Science and technology studies0.0120.005
Scholarly communication0.0070.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)Same topicEducation, Psychology, and Complexity ResearchFrench-language works237,207