Bibliographic record
Abstract
Three wood-carves from first quarter of 14th century The Strakonice Madonna comes from the Johannite prebend at Strakonice. The Madonna still has the monumentality of sculptural works of the thirteenth century. The roots her style lay in France (Rheims) and the Rhineland (Strasburg, Freiburg). This statue is one of the most important woks during the reign of king Václav II. So we can date this statue before 1300. The Madonna from Rouchovany is dated to first quarter of 14th century. The roots her style lay in Rheims, like Madonna from Strakonice, but we can find roots in Chartres too. Statue of Saint Benigna (Dobrotivá) comes from augustinian convent church at Dobrotivá. We can date this carved work before 1327, because medieval notes are preserved. Saint Benigna was one of companions princess Voršila. They wandered to Rome, but they were killed. The part of her body was transfered to monastery in 1320. Reffering to the iconographic study, we can see reference to Song of Songs from Old Testament. Rouchovany Madonna has got ring on left hand and it's link with motiv of Bridegroom and Bride. The same motiv we can see on Strakonice Madonna. Here Child caress mother's chin with his right hand. Jesus hold in left hand an apple like reference to "second" Adam, who rescues mankind from sins. There is a lot...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".