Our Lady of Sorrows from Kreuzberg by Český Krumlov and the matter of "some of the lost paintings by the Master of the Třeboň Altarpiece"
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The bachelor thesis deals with the panel painting of Our Lady of Sorrows from Kreuzberg by Český Krumlov from the collections of the Kunsthistorisches Museum in Vienna. Attention is paid to a detailed analysis of the panel itself, its medieval context and its relationship to other paintings created in Český Krumlov in the second quarter of the 15th century. The panel painting with Our Lady of Sorrows from Kreuzberg represented for Jaroslav Pešina, through its resemblance to Our Lady of Sorrows from Církvice by the Master of the Třeboň Altarpiece, evidence of adopting compositional schemes created in this important workshop. In the article Some of the Lost Paintings by the Master of the Třeboň Altarpiece, he attempted to prove the former existence of the now-defunct "influential" works by the Master of the Třeboň Altarpiece from later surviving works. Next aim of this thesis is to revise the used method of deduction and Pešina's conclusions on the basis of the current state of research. Keywords Our Lady of Sorrows from Kreuzberg, Master of the Třeboň Altarpiece, Bohemian medieval painting, Český Krumlov
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".