MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7135957155

Bootstrapping Zero-Coupon Rates from the Yield Curve

2015· book-chapter· en· W7135957155 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Manfred Frühwirth

Bibliographic record

VenueWU Research · 2015
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicStochastic processes and financial applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBootstrapping (finance)Yield curveCouponTreasurySwap (finance)Maturity (psychological)Forward rateYield (engineering)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

After a short motivation of the term structure of zero-coupon rates, the article describes how to derive the zero-coupon rates from quoted instruments with different maturities. The focus is on semi-annually compounded zero-coupon rates due to their popularity on major financial markets (e.g. USA, U.K., Canada). The bootstrapping technology is described in general (gradual extension of the maturity of the respective instrument used). Afterwards, the article concentrates on bootstrapping from coupon bond prices and from par coupon rates (like constant maturity treasury yields or swap rates). For both methodologies, the bootstrapping procedure is illustrated by means of a numerical example.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.404
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.333
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.017 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWU ResearchSame topicStochastic processes and financial applicationsFrench-language works237,207