MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7135967933

Analysis of Social and Economic Development of the City Quarter Prague 3

2016· dissertation· cs· W7135967933 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Radka Cuřínová

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature) · 2016
Typedissertation
Languagecs
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, Psychology, and Social Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)SWOT analysisCzechWork (physics)PopulationSocial changeOrder (exchange)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The topic of this diploma thesis is Analysis of Social and Economic Development of the City Quarter Prague 3. This thesis is focused on analysis of the selected indicators of social and economic development of the City Quarter Prague 3. On the basis of found information, it assesses present situation of the areas that its development influence most. The attention is devoted to the development of number of citizens, their migration and population structure. Part of this work evaluates the availability of local facilities and economy of Prague 3. The employed data come from the database of the Czech Statistical Office and from the City of Prague 3. Even the representatives of Prague 3 were interviewed in order to complete obtained information. At the end of the work, the SWOT analysis based on the works findings is created. It indicates its strong and weak parts and opportunities and threats of Prague 3. According to the analysis, the areas, the Prague 3 should support more or stop supporting, are identified.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)Same topicEducation, Psychology, and Social ResearchFrench-language works237,207