Transactions and Impulsions:Exhibition at the University of Lapland, Faculty of Art and Design
Bibliographic record
Abstract
e Transactions and impulsions exhibition at the University of Lapland galleries shows works by invited artists from Alaska and other parts of the USA, Canada, the Russian Federation, Finland, Norway and Sweden.Most of the artist are partners of the Arctic Sustainable Art and Design (ASAD) ematic Network, which aims to identify and share innovative practices promoting sustainable and responsible models of art and cooperation in education and art-based research.e exhibition shows how contemporary artists present and construct the multifaceted Arctic in their art and art-based research and also in an educational context.e artists use a wide range of artistic and media tools, such as installations, media art, photographs, videos, textile art and posters.Some of the artists use traditional materials, techniques and colours and ancient symbols in a contemporary context.e artworks raise questions about and o er fresh perspectives on crucial Arctic issues such as climate change, plastic pollution, advocacy for consideration of land-based knowledge and environmental responsibility.At the same time, the exhibition shows how artist, designers and art educators can became co-authors of local makers by commenting on and re ning the living culture and the visual appearance of the North.e exhibition proposes collaborative ways for art and art education to promote greater individual and community awareness of growing environmental challenges and to teach more sustainable ways of having intercultural encounters.Some of the artworks were shown in the ASAD network's earlier exhibitions, and some, such as the contemporary media art focusing on Arctic issues, are being displayed now for the rst time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.177 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".