Optimal subsampling for high-dimensional partially linear models via machine learning methods
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we explore optimal subsampling strategies for estimating the parametric regression coefficients in partially linear models with unknown nuisance functions involving high-dimensional and potentially endogenous covariates. To address model misspecifications and the curse of dimensionality, we leverage flexible machine learning (ML) techniques to estimate the unknown nuisance functions. By constructing an unbiased subsampling Neyman-orthogonal score function, we eliminate regularization bias. A two-step algorithm is then used to obtain appropriate ML estimators of the nuisance functions, mitigating the risk of over-fitting. Using martingale techniques, we establish the unconditional consistency and asymptotic normality of the subsample estimators. Furthermore, we derive optimal subsampling probabilities, including A-optimal and L-optimal probabilities as special cases. The proposed optimal subsampling approach is extended to partially linear instrumental variable models to account for potential endogeneity through instrumental variables. Simulation studies and an empirical analysis of the Physicochemical Properties of Protein Tertiary Structure dataset demonstrate the superior performance of our subsample estimators. © 2025 Yujing Shao, Lei Wang, Heng Lian and Haiying Wang.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.017 | 0.053 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".