MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7136486472 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.4366088

Additional file 8: of Contrasting biological potency of particulate matter collected at sites impacted by distinct industrial sources

2016· article· W7136486472 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Errol M. Thomson, Dalibor Breznan, Subramanian Karthikeyan, Christine MacKinnon-Roy, Ngoc Q. Vuong, Ewa Dabek-Zlotorzynska, Valbona Celo, Jean-Pierre Charland, Prem Kumarathasan, Jeffrey Brook, Renaud Vincent

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2016
Typearticle
Language
FieldVeterinary
TopicAnimal testing and alternatives
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParticulatesParticle sizePotencyLactate dehydrogenaseParticle (ecology)Aerosol

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cytotoxic responses of A549 cells to 24 h exposure to size-fractionated particulate matter collected in the vicinity of industrial sites according to the LDH release assay. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release into cell culture supernatants of A549 cells exposed for 24 h to size-fractionated and standard reference particles (left-side) and extracts from corresponding field blank filters that were transported to each site but remained unexposed to ambient air (right side). Data represent LDH release, adjusted for total cellular LDH content. Values are presented as average fold-effect (FE) over control ± standard error (n = 3). HB, Hamilton Beach steel mill; MA, Montréal AIEM petrochemical refinery; MC, Montréal copper smelter; SR, Sarnia petrochemical refinery; SW, Shawinigan aluminum smelter. Size-fractionated and standard reference particles. Three-way ANOVA (Size-fractionated particles): Site x Size (p = 0.002) and Size x Dose (p = 0.018) interactions. Asterisks represent significant pairwise comparisons (Holm-Sidak) as follows: doses within Size significantly different from 0 μg/cm2, or sites within Size significantly different from one another as indicated by brackets (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.001). Letters (a-n) represent sizes within Site significantly different from one another (p < 0.05). Two-way ANOVA (Standards): Particle (p = 0.002) and Dose (p < 0.001) main effects. Asterisks represent significant pairwise comparisons (Holm-Sidak) as follows: doses significantly different from 0 μg/cm2, or particles significantly different from one another as indicated by brackets (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.001). Field blanks. Three-way ANOVA: Dose (p < 0.001) main effect. Letter (a) spanned by a line represents doses significantly different from 0 μg/cm2 (p < 0.001). (PDF 55 kb)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.026
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.995
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.026
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9980.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.188
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.128 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicAnimal testing and alternativesFrench-language works237,207