MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Metasurface for High-Sensitivity Radar Sensing

2025· article· W7136746434 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Omid Bagheri, Omar M. Ramahi, George Shaker

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMetamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadarRangingSensitivity (control systems)X bandDielectricAperture (computer memory)MicrostripPower (physics)Emphasis (telecommunications)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the design and analysis of an enhanced near-field-focusing metasurface to improve the sensitivity and spatial resolution of millimeter-wave radar sensing systems, with an emphasis on biomedical applications. The proposed structure features a <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$9 \times 9$</tex> array of subwavelength unit cells to expand the effective aperture and increase the efficiency of the illumination. A three-layer architecture is introduced, incorporating a uniplanar compact photonic bandgap (UC-PBG) layer between two microstrip crossed-dipole layers, enabling improved phase compensation and sharper frequency selectivity across the <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$58-63 \text{GHz}$</tex> range with high quality factor performance. Each unitcell measures approximately <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$0.3 \lambda \times 0.3 \lambda$</tex> (<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\lambda$</tex> at 61 GHz) and is fabricated on thin Rogers Ro4003 substrates <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$(0.6 ~\text{mm})$</tex> to minimize dielectric loss and maintain a low profile. The results confirm that the proposed metasurface achieves substantial improvements in near-field radar sensing performance at <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\mathbf{6 1 ~ G H z}$</tex>, including a transmitted power enhancement of 14.5 dB and a reflected power improvement of 13.1 dB compared to the radaronly configuration. In a glucose detection scenario, the system demonstrates a 13.8 dB increase in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of 13.8 dB in glucose concentrations ranging from 0 to <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$50 \text{mg} / \text{mL}$</tex>.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.112
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMetamaterials and Metasurfaces ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207