MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Case for Agentic Transceivers in Physical AI-RF Circuits and Systems

2025· article· W7136772354 on OpenAlexaff
Arjuna Madanayake, Kasun Karunanayake, Robert C. Hacker, Ranga Rodrigo, Chamira Edussooriya, Shubhankar Majumdar, Leonid Belostotski

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicModular Robots and Swarm Intelligence
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectronic circuitTransceiverNoise (video)Integrated circuitSignal processing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This concept paper proposes an architecture that integrates agentic AI models with digital twin representations for each subsystem component in an RF transceiver. The digital twins, constructed using machine learning techniques such as deep learning and reinforcement learning, are paired with specialized, autonomous AI agent(s) capable of independent reasoning, planning, and adaptive action. Agentic AI models go beyond traditional rule-based/symbolic AI to autonomously select optimal strategies, synthesize data from diverse sources, and interact with both virtual and real-world environments. Ideas for simulations and experimental validations are proposed for future work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.534
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicModular Robots and Swarm IntelligenceFrench-language works237,207