MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7137008286 · doi:10.5737/236880763613

Assessment of suffering in Tunisian adolescents with sarcoma: A descriptive study

2025· article· W7137008286 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Amira Abbassi, Hatem Larousi, Asma Ben Hassine, Amani Khalifa

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Oncology Nursing Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSadnessLikert scaleDescriptive researchQuarter (Canadian coin)ArabicAffect (linguistics)Sarcoma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Sarcomas are malignant mesenchymal tumours that develop in bone or soft tissue. The different types include osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, synovial sarcoma, and chondrosarcoma. These tumours predominantly affect children and youth aged 10 to 19. Sarcoma patients often experience multidimensional suffering encompassing physical, psychological, social and spiritual aspects. The aim of this study was to explore the suffering of Tunisian adolescents with sarcoma treated at the Salah Azaiez Institute of Oncology in Tunis. Methodology: This descriptive quantitative study was conducted with 40 adolescents aged 10 to 19 years of age who were diagnosed with sarcoma and hospitalized at the Salah Azaiez Institute of Oncology. Two questionnaires were administered to participants once parental consent had been obtained: one sociodemographic questionnaire and the Adolescent Cancer Suffering Scale (ACSS), which had been translated into Arabic and validated.The ACSS comprises 41 items on a five-point Likert scale, plus one open-ended question. It evaluates six realms of suffering: physical, psychological, spiritual, social, cognitive, and global. The ACSS is used to explore adolescents' experience with their illness in a holistic manner, taking the multiple aspects of their suffering into account. Results: More than half of the study respondents (55%) expressed the need to have their family present while they were in the hospital. Sadness and occasional pain were reported by 40% of adolescents. The same proportion (40%) found being forced to miss school particularly difficult. More than one third (35%) reported concerns about their future, while one quarter (25%) said they were still trying to make sense of their illness and their health experiences. Discussion and conclusion: The cancer journey is a particularly challenging one, especially for a growing adolescent. Sarcoma patients face significant disruption in their lives, spending more time in the hospital than at school. Given the sudden emergence of symptoms associated with the disease, the existential threat it represents and the uncertainty it brings about for the future, it is important to embrace an approach that incorporates practices in line with the specific needs of adolescents in order to provide them with optimal care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Oncology Nursing JournalSame topicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeFrench-language works237,207