MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7137223280 · doi:10.1145/3772673.3772679

Perceptlets: Key to Machine Learning

2025· article· W7137223280 on OpenAlexaff
Guy Baron Olney, Leland Eugene Olney

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicCognitive Science and Mapping
Canadian institutionsTellabs (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKey (lock)Matching (statistics)Representation (politics)AutomatonExternal Data RepresentationApplications of artificial intelligenceKnowledge representation and reasoningComponent (thermodynamics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Current approaches to Artificial Intelligence and machine learning are limited by several intractable problems. Our research shows that eliminating the requirement to understand the data being processed will allow a different data representation created by relating sensor data elements to each other, spatially and temporally. In the course of developing this idea, a new and innovative data type, named “Perceptlets,” was discovered. Perceptlets have very unique properties that allow inexact matching of input and memory data as well as allowing for the creation of primitive procedures. Such procedures, after minimal training, let the machine learn without intervention. Mathematical models of the necessary components of such an indeterminate cognitive automaton were developed to illustrate plausibility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.921
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCognitive Science and MappingFrench-language works237,207