MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7137376210 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.4388198

Additional file 15: Figure S7. of The genome of the yellow potato cyst nematode, Globodera rostochiensis, reveals insights into the basis of parasitism and virulence

2016· article· W7137376210 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sebastian Eves-van den Akker, Dominik R. Laetsch, Peter Thorpe, Catherine Lilley, Etienne Danchin, Martine Da Rocha, Corinne Rancurel, Nancy Holroyd, James D. Cotton, Amir Szitenberg, Éric Grenier, Josselin Montarry, Benjamin Mimee, Marc‐Olivier Duceppe, Ian Boyes, Jessica Marvin, Laura Jones, Hazijah Yusup, Joël Lafond-Lapalme, Magali Esquibet, Michaël Sabeh, Michael Rott, Hein Overmars, Anna Finkers-Tomczak, Geert Smant, Georgios Koutsovoulos, Vivian Blok, Sophie Mantelin, Peter Cock, Wendy Phillips, Bernard Henrissat, Peter Urwin, Mark Blaxter, John Jones

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2016
Typearticle
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicNematode management and characterization studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhylogenetic treeGenomePhylogeneticsStrain (injury)Taxonomy (biology)Globodera rostochiensis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Phylogenetic analysis of G. rostochiensis pathotypes. A. A maximum likelihood phylogeny based on 730,705 genome wide SNPs. Two distinct groups of Ro1 are together separated from Ro2, Ro3, Ro4 and Ro5. Node labels indicate bootstrap support values for 100 iterations. B. Principle component analysis (PCA) based on the same dataset suggest that for pathotype Ro1, intra-pathotype variation is similar to inter-pathotype variation. REF Ro1 = Reference strain Ro1 assembly, MAR149 Ro1 = British Columbia, QC Ro1 = Quebec, Ro19 Ro1 = European, NFLD Ro1 = Newfoundland, SCRI_Ro2, SCRI_Ro3, SCRI_Ro4, SCRI_Ro5 are pathotype populations from the James Hutton Institute collection. (PDF 1636 kb)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.882
Threshold uncertainty score0.424

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5820.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicNematode management and characterization studiesFrench-language works237,207