MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7137505139

Charles-Édouard Harang. Quand les jeunes catholiques découvrent le monde. Les mouvements catholiques de jeunesse. De la colonisation à la coopération 1920-1991. Paris, Cerf, 2010, 14,5 x 23,5 cm, 448 pages (Coll. « Histoire ») Isbn 10 : 220409143X / Isbn 13 : 978-2-204-09143-5, / 39 €

2010· other· fr· W7137505139 on OpenAlexaff
J Paumier

Bibliographic record

VenueCairn.info · 2010
Typeother
Languagefr
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCentre Jeunesse de Quebec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWestern europeColonial periodFace (sociological concept)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RésuméFille du pasteur Raoul Allier (1862-1939), Idelette Allier (1898-1980) accomplit au Cameroun deux séjours entre 1930 et 1936, dans le cadre de la Société des Missions Évangéliques de Paris. L’originalité de son parcours, justifie que l’on s’intéresse à elle : d’une part, parce qu’après avoir été missionnaire, Idelette est devenue l’une des premières femmes ethnologues du pays, publiant de nombreux ouvrages et articles, et se passionnant pour les langues et les migrations des peuples ; d’autre part, en raison de sa personnalité désireuse d’affronter la réalité, de faire face aux obstacles et de remettre en question les idées reçues. Tour à tour missionnaire, femme d’administrateur, et ethnologue, Idelette est à la croisée de différents courants de pensée ; elle a hérité de nombre de valeurs et idées spécifiques à chacun de ces milieux, valeurs qui, au fil des ans, se sont soit modifiées, soit juxtaposées. Ainsi, la pensée d’Idelette Allier mêle vieux stéréotypes et nouvel humanisme colonial, permanence des vieux clichés et rêves de fraternité et d’union, constat des effets négatifs de la colonisation, mais aussi profonde croyance en ses bienfaits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.200
Threshold uncertainty score0.399

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0580.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCairn.infoFrench-language works237,207