MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7137706277

Pla d’acció per a la perspectiva de gènere del Museu de Ciències Naturals de Barcelona 2021-2023 = Plan de acción para la perspectiva de género del Museo de Ciencias Naturales de Barcelona 2021-2023

2023· article· W7137706277 on OpenAlexaff
Lina Ubero, Laia Collado, Dacha Atienza

Bibliographic record

VenueRepositori Obert de Coneixement de lAjuntament de Barcelona · 2023
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicSex and Gender in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsWSP (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)ConfusionWhite (mutation)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’article presenta el pla d’acció per a la perspectiva de gènere del Museu de Ciències Naturals de Barcelona 2021-2023, fruit d’un procés llarg i sense referents que ha implicat una part important del personal del museu. Les principals línies de reflexió i de treball, la recerca de referents, la definició de les accions i dels indicadors, la formació i l’avaluació intenten dibuixar una experiència complexa i molt important per al museu.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.009
Scholarly communication0.0090.003
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRepositori Obert de Coneixement de lAjuntament de BarcelonaSame topicSex and Gender in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207