Competencias interpersonales en ambientes educativos: una aproximación a su práctica docente en el colegio ciudad de Montreal en la ciudad de Bogotá D.C.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El propósito del presente trabajo de grado es plantear una propuesta pedagógica que fortalezca las competencias interpersonales del trabajo en equipo, manejo de conflictos, comunicación asertiva y liderazgo de los docentes. Estas competencias se consideran que son importantes para desempeñarse exitosamente en el ámbito personal, académico y laboral (Arias, Hincapié, & Paredes, 2020). La investigación utilizó el enfoque mixto con un diseño no experimental de tipo descriptivo. La población investigada la conforman 11 docentes de distintos niveles académicos, preescolar, básica primaria y equipo directivo a los cuales se les aplicó 4 cuestionarios estructurados en escala de Likert. Dichos instrumentos fueron validados por expertos externos y evaluados en su confiabilidad.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".