MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7138007404 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.19072467

Arquitetura do século XX no bairro de Higienópolis

2005· article· pt· W7138007404 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2005
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican Literature and Humor Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)ArchitecturePeriod (music)Urban planning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resumo: Relato sobre arquitetura moderna no Bairro de Higienópolis, em São Paulo, SP, a peculiaridade desse acervo e sua preservação. Critérios utilizados para a preservação dessa arquitetura. Discussão da importância de instrumentos urbanísticos para a preservação de bens arquitetônicos, aliados a instrumentos tradicionais como o tombamento, a partir da experiência desenvolvida em São Paulo. Abstract: The preservation case of modern architecture in the Quarter of Higienópolis, in São Paulo, SP. and the special characteristics of that access of architecture. The criteria adopted for the preservation of this period of architecture. Discussion on the importance of the urban planning instruments related with preservation combined with some traditional instruments (as listings), analyzing the experience developed in São Paulo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.852
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1200.044

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it