MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Modular Information Bottleneck Encoding for Scalable Task Inference in IoT Networks

2025· article· W7138832037 on OpenAlexaff
Hossein Bijanrostami, E.S. Sousa, Mohammad Karimzadeh‐Farshbafan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEncoding (memory)BottleneckInferenceScalabilityEdge computingEncoderTask (project management)Block (permutation group theory)HeuristicEdge device

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The proliferation of intelligent IoT devices and the growing demand for low-latency, task-aware inference have placed significant strain on communication and computation resources in next-generation (6G) wireless networks. Nevertheless, it is still an open problem to enable a semantic communication that alleviates the memory management in memory-constrained IoT networks. In this paper, we propose a modular and memory-efficient semantic communication framework for distributed task inference in IoT networks. Leveraging the information bottleneck (IB) principle, we introduce a novel sequential multi-step feature encoding scheme, wherein each encoder block is trained independently with earlier blocks held constant. This design supports flexible and reusable deployment of pre-trained encoders across heterogeneous devices with memory constraints. Building on this foundation, we formulate a multi-gateway edge inference architecture, where gateways selectively offload compressed task-relevant features to a core edge server. To handle resource limitations at the gateway level, we model a nonlinear mixed-integer optimization problem that selects encoder blocks for tasks in a manner that maximizes inference quality while satisfying delay and memory constraints. A greedy heuristic algorithm is proposed to efficiently solve the resource allocation problem. Simulation results demonstrate that our framework achieves up to 40% reduction in normalized delay compared to baseline methods, while tripling the number of concurrently supported tasks in the network.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207