MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

BIER-MC: Multi-Connectivity Approach for Latency-Efficient Multicast Routing

2025· article· W7138889349 on OpenAlexaff
Mostafa Abdollahi, Zhiming Huang, Jianping Pan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicSatellite Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMulticastXcastSource-specific multicastUnicastPragmatic General MulticastDistance Vector Multicast Routing ProtocolProtocol Independent Multicast

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Integrating terrestrial networks together with non-terrestrial networks, such as Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites, can significantly enhance network reliability and reduce latency in unicast and multicast protocols. To use such a capability and reduce end-to-end latency, many transport-layer unicast protocols, such as Multipath TCP (MPTCP) and Multipath QUIC (MPQUIC), have adopted multi-connectivity (MC) by transmitting over multiple interfaces at the sender host. However, traditional and modern multicast protocols suppose that the sender host accesses the core network using a single path, leading to high end-to-end latency at destinations. In this regard, we first demonstrate in a real-world testbed that MC significantly improves network latency in multicasting compared to single-connectivity approaches. We then introduce a Bit Indexed Explicit Replication (BIER) Multi-Connectivity (BIER-MC) method designed to reduce end-to-end latency within the BIER protocol, as a modern multicast protocol. Our comparison indicates that BIER-MC outperforms traditional BIER implementations using multicast trees in terms of latency up to 5×, bandwidth usage up to 2.5×, and edge betweenness centrality up to 15×.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.853
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSatellite Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207