MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

BIER-MC: Multi-Connectivity Approach for Latency-Efficient Multicast Routing

2025· article· W7138889349 on OpenAlexaff
Mostafa Abdollahi, Zhiming Huang, Jianping Pan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicSatellite Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMulticastXcastSource-specific multicastUnicastPragmatic General MulticastDistance Vector Multicast Routing ProtocolProtocol Independent Multicast

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Integrating terrestrial networks together with non-terrestrial networks, such as Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites, can significantly enhance network reliability and reduce latency in unicast and multicast protocols. To use such a capability and reduce end-to-end latency, many transport-layer unicast protocols, such as Multipath TCP (MPTCP) and Multipath QUIC (MPQUIC), have adopted multi-connectivity (MC) by transmitting over multiple interfaces at the sender host. However, traditional and modern multicast protocols suppose that the sender host accesses the core network using a single path, leading to high end-to-end latency at destinations. In this regard, we first demonstrate in a real-world testbed that MC significantly improves network latency in multicasting compared to single-connectivity approaches. We then introduce a Bit Indexed Explicit Replication (BIER) Multi-Connectivity (BIER-MC) method designed to reduce end-to-end latency within the BIER protocol, as a modern multicast protocol. Our comparison indicates that BIER-MC outperforms traditional BIER implementations using multicast trees in terms of latency up to 5×, bandwidth usage up to 2.5×, and edge betweenness centrality up to 15×.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSatellite Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207