Identification of north-western Atlantic Porphyra (Bangiaceae, Bangiales) based on sequence variation in nuclear SSU and plastid rbcL genes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Six species of Porphyra have commonly been recognized in the north-western Atlantic from Long Island Sound to the Canadian Maritimes: P. amplissima, P. leucosticra, P. linearis, P. miniata, P. purpurea, and P. umbilicalis. Distinguishing them with certainty has been problematic. A DNA-based system of molecular identification was developed using partial sequences of the nuclear small subunit ribosomal RNA gene (SSU) or the plastid ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase–oxygenase large subunit gene (rbcL). Multiple samples of each taxon were surveyed for intraspecific variation. Intraspecific SSU divergences for Porphyra ‘leucosticta’, P. ‘miniata’, P. ‘umbilicalis’, and P. ‘purpurea’ ranged from 0% to 1%. There was more variation for P. ‘amplissima’ (0–2.1%) and P. ‘linearis’ (0–3.5%); however, each taxon was monophyletic. No intraspecific differences were observed for these taxa in rbcL (one to eight samples per taxon). These sequences were compared with P. yezoensis U51, introduced to Maine, and with P. ‘dioica’, a north-east Atlantic Porphyra easily confused with P. ‘purpurea’. To discriminate between P. ‘purpurea’, P. ‘umbilicalis’, and P. ‘leucosticta’, SSU variation was used to design primers for the Allele-Specific Polymerase Chain Reaction™. With molecular tools, we could classify over 80% of the monostromatic specimens surveyed, but the residue of unidentifiable specimens may indicate the existence of further monostromatic species in the north-west Atlantic. Porphyra ‘purpurea’ was found to occur further south than previously recorded. A morphologically cryptic Porphyra was discovered at Herring Cove, Nova Scotia, Canada.† Phylogenetic analyses using SSU or rbcL sequences showed ‘soft incongruence’ between gene trees, i.e. the topologies of the phylograms were similar but not identical, with only weak to moderate bootstrap support for the nodes that differed. Both trees strongly supported a clade including P. ‘purpurea’, P. ‘umbilicalis’, P. ‘linearis’, and P. ‘dioica’. Porphyra sp. Herring Cove was allied with the remaining Porphyra taxa in the SSU tree. The rbcL phylogeny was less well resolved, consisting of a polytomy of a P. ‘purpurea’–P. ‘umbilicalis’–P. ‘linearis’–P. ‘dioica’ clade, Porphyra sp. Herring Cove, a clade comprising P. ‘amplissima’ and P. ‘miniata’, and a P. ‘suborbiculata’–P. ‘leucosticta’–P. yezoensis clade.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".