Focused ultrasound for brain metastases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Brain metastases (BMs) increasingly represent a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients. The efficacy of systemic therapies for BMs, in contrast to extracranial metastases (EMs), remains limited secondary to a host of challenges. These include insufficient drug delivery due to the blood-brain barrier and blood-tumor barrier, the unique immunological milieu in the tumor microenvironment and cerebrospinal fluid, the diversity of immunogenomic landscapes in BMs across genetically distinct malignancies, the branching evolution of BM from EMs, and the challenges in longitudinally obtaining information regarding clinically actionable genetic alterations in BMs for precision oncology. These complex, long-standing challenges require treatment strategies that address multiple problems concurrently, as represented by the potential of focused ultrasound (FUS) for enhancing effectiveness of several existing BM-specific management strategies. Beyond historically investigated applications of FUS for BMs, including thermoablation and histotripsy, new frontiers include enhanced drug delivery of systemic therapies, plasma sono-liquid biopsy of BM-derived factors, radiosensitization, and immunomodulation. These applications, as discussed here, enable multiple combinatorial opportunities of FUS with targeted- and/or immunotherapies for BMs. With multiple ultrasound delivery platforms (including MR-guided, neuro-navigation-guided, and implantable devices) being investigated in neuro-oncology trials worldwide, this review provides strategies for designing and optimizing future research efforts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".