MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7139003671 · doi:10.25940/roper-31122642

Fannie Mae's National Housing Survey Monthly Home Purchase Sentiment Index (HPSI) and Key Indicators - January, 2025 (a subset of the complete monthly Fannie Mae National Housing Survey)

2025· other· W7139003671 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fannie Mae Foundation

Bibliographic record

VenueRoper Center for Public Opinion Research iPOLL · 2025
Typeother
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRentingDebtIndex (typography)Rental housingHouse priceMortgage insurancePrice indexQuarter (Canadian coin)Household debt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Financial decisions (1); phone type (1); employment status (3); direction of the economy (3); financial situation predictions (1); home ownership/selling house (6); moving predictions (3); direction of home prices (3); rental prices (3); mortgage interest rates (1); home mortgage (4); housing status & mortgage debt (5); homeownership (4); owning vs. renting (3); home finances situation (4); sources of mortgage information/mortgage (21); and household financial management (2).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.040
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Bibliometrics, Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.826
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0400.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0130.010
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0050.007
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.156
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRoper Center for Public Opinion Research iPOLLFrench-language works237,207