MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Deep Learning Framework for Schizophrenia Detection and Classification Using Stacked Sparse Autoencoder

2025· article· W7139015003 on OpenAlexaff
Vasam Srinivas, Naramula Venkatesh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldNeuroscience
TopicBrain Tumor Detection and Classification
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutoencoderDiscriminative modelSoftmax functionDeep learningPattern recognition (psychology)NeuroimagingClassifier (UML)NoveltyGeneralization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Schizophrenia (SZ) is a complex psychiatric disorder that severely impacts cognitive and social functioning. Conventional diagnosis often depends on subjective clinical evaluation, which may delay intervention and affect treatment outcomes. This paper presents a deep learning framework that employs a Stacked Sparse Auto encoder (SSAE) for the automated detection and classification of SZ. The proposed model extracts compact and discriminative features from multimodal neuroimaging data under sparsity constraints, thereby improving generalization and reducing over fitting. A Softmax classifier maps the learned features into diagnostic categories to distinguish healthy controls from SZ patients. Experimental results on publicly available datasets demonstrate that the model achieves an accuracy of 98.91%, sensitivity of 89.57%, and specificity of 80.58%, outperforming state-of-the-art baselines. The novelty of this work lies in integrating SSAE with multimodal imaging to provide robust, efficient, and clinically applicable decision support for schizophrenia diagnosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.881
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBrain Tumor Detection and ClassificationFrench-language works237,207