Generalized User-Oriented Image Semantic Coding Empowered by Large Vision-Language Model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Semantic communication has shown outstanding performance in preserving the overall source information in wireless transmission. For semantically rich content such as images, human users are often interested in specific regions depending on their intent. Moreover, recent semantic coding models are mostly trained on specific datasets. However, real-world applications may involve images out of the distribution of training dataset, which makes generalization a crucial but largely unexplored problem. To incorporate user’s intent into semantic coding, in this paper, we propose a generalized user-oriented image semantic coding (UO-ISC) framework, where the user provides a text query indicating its intent. The transmitter extracts features from the source image which are relevant to the user’s query. The receiver reconstructs an image based on those features. To enhance the generalization ability, we integrate contrastive language image pre-training (CLIP) model, which is a pretrained large vision-language model (VLM), into our proposed UO-ISC framework. To evaluate the relevance between the reconstructed image and the user’s query, we introduce the user-intent relevance loss, which is computed by using a pretrained large VLM, large language-and-vision assistant (LLaVA) model. When performing zero-shot inference on unseen objects, simulation results show that the proposed UO-ISC framework outperforms the state-of-the-art query-aware image semantic coding in terms of the answer match rate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".