MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7139160762

Quarterly Economic Commentary, Autumn 2008. With Special ArticleAn Analysis of Revisions to Growth Rates in theIrish Quarterly National Accounts

2008· other· W7139160762 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alan H. Barrett, Ide Kearney, Jean Goggin, Martin O'Brien

Bibliographic record

VenueArchive of European Integration (AEI) (University of Pittsburgh) · 2008
Typeother
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExchequerIrishQuarter (Canadian coin)State (computer science)Government (linguistics)Real estateEstateFinancial analysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This Commentary is being prepared at a time when the world’s financial markets are in a state of unprecedented turmoil. The most recent events represent a serious escalation of the crisis. The failure of the US Congress to pass the Bush Administration’s first bail-out plan dominated the financial landscape last week, along with bail-outs such as those of Fortis in the Netherlands and Hypo Real Estate in Germany and the nationalisation of Bradford and Bingley in the UK. While the passing of the second Bush bail-out plan last Friday is a welcome development in terms of halting the slide towards chaos, the international situation still remains critical. The Government here has moved to restore confidence to the Irish financial system through its guarantees of all deposits and borrowings of six financial institutions. Other economic news within Ireland which has impacted upon our analysis includes poor third quarter Exchequer returns and an alarming rise in the numbers on the Live Register.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.162

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0480.033

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchive of European Integration (AEI) (University of Pittsburgh)French-language works237,207