MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7139178868

Залежність рівня життя населення в Україні від політичних циклів(Dependence of standards of living in Ukraine from political cycles)

2019· article· uk· W7139178868 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Repository of Ostroh Academy (Ostroh Academy) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageuk
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicLabor Market and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPresidential systemPoliticsStandard of livingOpposition (politics)Quarter (Canadian coin)Inflation (cosmology)State (computer science)Presidential election
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

У статті досліджено залежність рівня життя населення України від політичних циклів. Виявлено вплив на зростання доходів населення, інфляції, тінізації та доларизації економіки. Визначено, що основним інструментом впливу є зростання соціальних стандартів. Це призводить до підвищення дефіцитності Державного бюджету України і стимулювання інфляції. Зміни соціальної політики пов’язані з виборами Президента України. In the article, the authors examine the dependence of the living standards in Ukraine from political cycles. The authors found that the political cycles represented by presidential elections have the strongest influence in Ukraine. Thus, the growth of minimum wages and pensions in 2000s (except 2016) in Ukraine depended on the presidential election. The increase in social standards and social benefits in the pre-election period increases the deficit of the State Budget of Ukraine, stimulating the growth of inflation after the election period. The authors found that the government predominantly increases the minimum social standards the quarter right before the election or in the quarter of elections, which confirms the stake of politicians on the short-sightedness of voters. The greatest growth of social standards occurred in 2005 and 2010, despite the state of the economy, when the opposition was coming to power. Such measures led to the growth of inflation in Ukraine in all the years following the elections, except in 2010 and 2012. In 2010, inflation was observed in the first half of the year. The growth of inflationary processes always led to a slowdown in economic development after the election period. Independence of the employment rates from the actions of political cycles is an important peculiarity in the economy of Ukraine. The most of candidate programs include the points about the increase in household incomes rather than reducing unemployment. During all election years there was an increase in incomes and real cash incomes of the population of Ukraine. However, the modeling of minimum wages and pensions dependence on elections in Ukraine showed a lack of citizens’ income. Governments do not use the state’s ability to develop and increase social guarantees. The timely growth of these indicators could have an impact on GDP growth and commodity turnover. This leads to an increase in the level of the shadow economy of Ukraine, the growth of the dollarization level in the election years and the devaluation of the monetary unit after the election. After significant depreciation fluctuations in the 1990s and early 2000s, Ukraine’s population took into account the effects of political cycles on foreign currency before the elections.)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it