Bibliographic record
Abstract
BAUTZEN - Aktion "Buchpatenschaft" in der Stadtbibliothek Bautzen // CHEMNITZ - Rekordergebnisse im Jubiläumsjahr // Chemnitzer Literaturtage LESELUST // Wiki-Datenbank Chemnitzer Skulpturen im öffentlichen Raum // Leseclubs in den Schulferien // DRESDEN - Leichter suchen und finden. Start der SLUB-Katalogerneuerung // Sachsens Ministerpräsident Stanislaw Tillich in Québec // Die SLUB im Spiegel der Fachschaften. Gemeinsames Engagement für die bestmögliche Bibliothek // Die Sächsische Hofkapelle lebt auf. Die ersten 1.000 Notenmanuskripte sind online // La vita e'' bella // Eingangsbereich der SLUB komplett ohne Zettelkataloge // Bildnachlass Richard Peter sen. digital verfügbar // Dresden hilft Köln. Ein kleiner Baustein zum großen Puzzle des Kölner Stadtarchivs // Verleihung des Titels "Dresdner Bibliothek des Jahres 2009" // Sachsenspiegel italienisch // Die Sieger im diesjährigen stadtweiten Vorlesewettbewerb // LEIPZIG - Robert Schumann zum 200. Geburtstag // ZWICKAU - Schumann-Autographe werden erschlossen
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.771 | 0.733 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".