MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7139218960

Targeting NINJ1 to Prevent Tumor Lysis Syndrome

2025· dissertation· W7139218960 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Febby Pandya

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace (University of Toronto) · 2025
Typedissertation
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicMethemoglobinemia and Tumor Lysis Syndrome
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSickkids Research InstituteHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsCytotoxic T cellLytic cycleCytotoxicityIntracellularApoptosisIn vivoProgrammed cell deathLysisTumor lysis syndrome
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tumor Lysis Syndrome (TLS) is a potentially life-threatening complication of cytotoxic chemotherapy, arising from tumor cell rupture and the subsequent release of intracellular metabolites into circulation. The resulting metabolic derangements can lead to renal failure, arrhythmias, seizures, and in some cases death, yet targeted treatments for TLS remain unavailable. Recent studies have identified NINJ1 as a critical regulator of plasma membrane rupture (PMR), suggesting it acts as a final control switch for lytic cell death. The loss of NINJ1, whether through genetic knockout or pharmacological inhibition via glycine, has been shown to protect cells from PMR without altering overall cell death rates. Our study demonstrates that NINJ1 inhibition reduces PMR by up to 50% following cytotoxic chemotherapy, while maintaining their antitumor efficacy as confirmed by TUNEL and MTT assays, as well as caspase-3 activation in hematological malignancies. These findings highlight NINJ1’s potential as a targeted TLS intervention, warranting further in vivo studies to explore its clinical applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace (University of Toronto)Same topicMethemoglobinemia and Tumor Lysis SyndromeFrench-language works237,207