MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7139241233

The benefits of an having an independent telecommunications regulatory authority: a SADC perspective

2010· other· en· W7139241233 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Christine Fadzai Chakauya

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town) · 2010
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRegulatorIndependence (probability theory)Argument (complex analysis)Perspective (graphical)Institution
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The research paper has a fourfold goal in highlighting the role of an independent regulat9ry authority in the telecommunications sector. The backdrop of the analysis will be on the ability of the telecommunications regulator to maintain independence whilst at the same time diligently• carry out designated duties. Chapter one delves into the history of chosen case studies on Zimbabwe and South Africa focusing on their paths to privatization and individual impact that the independent regulator has had on the industry. The argument being, although they have similar origins as regards their background to telecommunications, the diverse environments in which the independent regulators operate are different. Therefore the intended results will inevitably vary individually. Assessment will be on the impact on telephony, particularly on cellular operators and not on broadcasting. Chapter 2 seeks to explore the importance of independence in the regulators office. An in-depth consideration the reasons affecting the ability to be independent will be highlighted. The chapter focuses on the importance of the role of the regulator taking into consideration the guidelines as recommended by the World Trade Organization. Bearing in mind the case studies have similar origins in telecommunicatiQns, the diverse environments in which the independent regulators operate are different. Therefore the intended results will inevitably vary individually. Chapter 3 analyses functions of the regulator and the frameworks adopted to achieve desired goals. Suggestions on prospective reforms of the institution of the independent regulators will be analysed, as a comparison of the chosen case studies. South Africa and Kenya will be used as comparisons, looking to how they have handled problematic issues such as interconnection which some developing nations are still coming to grips with. The diverse nature of the respective institutions would be effective in showing that where impartiality exists it contributes to the independence of the regulators. An in-depth consideration of commitments made to the World Trade Organisation will be tallied against individual performance in promoting competition on the market. The concluding chapter will look at possible solutions when it comes to tackling potential problematic issues, such as interconnection. An analysis of the telecommunications industries of the United States of America, Canada and Australia will be taken.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.156

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0100.024
Scholarly communication0.0180.008
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0060.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town)French-language works237,207