MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7139244552

Development of 2D Spin-Echo Rosette MR Spectroscopic Imaging of the Human Brain at 3 Tesla

2025· dissertation· W7139244552 on OpenAlexaff
Lubna Burki

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace (University of Toronto) · 2025
Typedissertation
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman brainMagnetic resonance spectroscopic imagingPipeline (software)Brain tissueLipid accumulationVoxelRosette (schizont appearance)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) is a non-invasive method for measuring brain tissue metabolite concentrations in vivo. A challenge in 1H-MRSI is that extracranial adipose tissue gives rise to lipid signals which appear in the MR spectra of voxels within the brain, hindering reliable quantification of metabolites-of-interest. The goal of this thesis was to develop a pipeline for acquisition, reconstruction, processing and quantification of whole-slice 1H-MRSI of the human brain, with a focus on mitigating lipid contamination. My first aim involved the development of a 2D spin-echo rosette MRSI pulse sequence, and optimization of echo time and spatial resolution. My second aim was to expand on reconstruction and pre-processing pipeline for rosette MRSI data in the FID-A toolkit. Finally, using these approaches, I demonstrated the acquisition of rapid high-resolution 2D 1H-MRSI maps with minimal lipid contamination. Overall, the methods presented in this work will advance MRSI for neurochemistry studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace (University of Toronto)→Same topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications→French-language works237,207→