MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7139253997

Case Global: News from the International Law Centers & Institutes

2013· article· W7139253997 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Case Western Reserve University School of Law, The Frederick K. Cox International Law Center

Bibliographic record

VenueeYLS (Yale Law School) · 2013
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal Rights and Human Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternational lawAccountabilityCommon lawReading (process)Public international lawCustomary international lawComparative law
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vol. 6 [sic] [5], #1 (2013) Special Report: Professors help establish accountability mechanisms for Syrian atrocities A Message from Dean Scharf Worth Reading--Recent Faculty Publications/Activities Case launches New Online LLM Case Professor’s New Book Explores Accelerated Formation of Customary International Law Case law grad appointed UN/Africa Union Chief Mediator for Darfur Case launches new exchange and concurrent degree programs with 21 foreign partners Case offers world’s first free online international law course International Law Talk Radio from Case celebrates its first year Case International Law Moot Court teams excel again in 2013 Record number of foreign lawyers received LLM degrees from CWRU in 2013... The American Lawyer features PILPG – a prestigious NGO with special ties to CWRU Alumni spotlights (Andres Perez and Danielle Fritz) News from our Canada-US Law Institute In the past 5 years, 155 Case Law students have interned at 98 placements in 37 countries Recent Graduate Profiles (Christopher Rassi and Nathan Quick and others) 2012-2013 Major Events Round Up Save the Date -- Upcoming Events

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.197
Threshold uncertainty score0.658

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1970.068

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeYLS (Yale Law School)Same topicLegal Rights and Human RightsFrench-language works237,207