MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7139254067

Investigating Cell-Types and Pathways Responsible for Increased Seizure Generation in a Model of Neurofibromatosis Type 1

2025· dissertation· W7139254067 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Avery Cameron

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace (University of Toronto) · 2025
Typedissertation
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGovernment of Canada
KeywordsNeurofibromin 1NeurofibromatosisPI3K/AKT/mTOR pathwayInterneuronExcitatory postsynaptic potentialEpilepsyMAPK/ERK pathway
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a neurocutaneous disorder where individuals have increased prevalence of seizures and epilepsy. Some cases are secondary to NF1-related intracranial lesions, but others may be related to the genetic mutation itself through unknown mechanisms. Decreased neurofibromin in NF1 causes increased mTOR and ERK signaling and interneuron overactivity. We hypothesized: 1) decreased levels of neurofibromin in interneurons is sufficient to increase seizure susceptibility and 2) pharmacological inhibition of mTOR will normalize the increased seizure susceptibility. Contrary to our hypothesis, we found decreased neurofibromin in vGlut2+ cells increased seizure susceptibility. While mTOR inhibition decreased susceptibility in Nf1+/- mice, there was a similar effect from vehicle alone (DMSO) which correlated with decreased S6 and Akt activity in the cortex and hippocampus. Our findings suggest increased seizure susceptibility in NF1 is driven at least in part by vGlut2+ excitatory neurons. Additional testing will need to be conducted to properly evaluate the role of mTOR inhibition on seizure susceptibility in NF1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace (University of Toronto)Same topicNeurofibromatosis and Schwannoma CasesFrench-language works237,207