United States Pharmacopeia (USP) <800> Standards: Increasing Compliance of Safe Handling and Proper Administration of USP General Chapter <800> Drugs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Problem: United States Pharmacopeia (USP) developed a set of standards to minimize exposure risks to patients, healthcare workers, and the environment when preparing, handling, and administering hazardous drugs (HDs) known as USP <800> HDs. The guidelines became effective December 1, 2019, but additional information is needed to ensure healthcare personnel are complying with the standards. Context: Two medical surgical units from Hospital A were included in this project. Currently mandatory online modules about USP <800> standards are provided annually to every healthcare worker, but it is unknown if the policies and procedures are being followed appropriately. Interventions: Active and passive observations as well as inspections were used to compile data regarding the compliance of USP <800> standards of both healthcare workers and within the hospital setting. Surveys were conducted through informal ‘elbow-to-elbow’ interviews with hospital employees, primarily nurses, to collect subjective evidence. Measures: The measures can be divided into two categories: personnel and atmosphere compliance. Measures to determine personnel compliance include determining a current level of knowledge and comfortability, collecting self-reported compliance to the standards, and observing personal protective equipment (PPE) donning and doffing techniques. Atmosphere compliances are measured by calculating the total number of patients taking USP <800> HDs, evaluating the accuracy and efficiency of notifications in the electronic health record (EHR), documenting the frequency of correctly displayed signage on patient doors, and assessing supplies located on USP <800> carts. Results: Nurses self-reported a high level of knowledge and comfortability regarding safe handling and administration practices of USP <800> HDs. However, despite over a quarter of the patients being on at least one USP <800> drug, compliance with proper PPE recommendations, signage, and accessibility of supplies was low. Conclusions: This project determined that healthcare employees at Hospital A are not consistently following the recommended USP <800> standards. It also provided a baseline knowledge for future education to ensure safety of patients, healthcare employees, and the environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".