MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7139334130

Heterogeneous Aqueous CO2 Reduction Using a Pyrene-Modified Rhenium(I) Diimine Complex

2019· other· W7139334130 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Soumalya Sinha, Ana Sonea, William Shen, Samuel S. Hanson, Jeffrey J. Warren

Bibliographic record

VenueSummit (Simon Fraser University) · 2019
Typeother
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
KeywordsCatalysisDiimineSelectivityAqueous solutionElectrochemistryAdsorptionMoleculeHeterogeneous catalysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The development of molecular catalysts and materials that can convert CO2 into a value-added product is a great chemical challenge.Molecular catalysts set benchmarks in catalyst investigation and design, but incorporation of these catalysts into solid-state materials, and optimization of the electrochemical operating conditions, is still needed.For example, rhenium(I) diimine catalysts show almost quantitative selectivity for conversion of CO2 to CO in acetonitrile, but modification of diimine backbones can be challenging if the goal is to incorporate such molecules into materials.Presented here is a Re(I) complex with a 2-(2´-quinolyl)benzimidazole (QuBIm-H) ligand, where N-alkylation with a pyrene derivative allows access to a catalyst that can be adsorbed onto electrodes for aqueous CO2 reduction chemistry.The Re(I) catalysts are inactive for homogeneous CO2 reduction reaction in MeCN.However, when adsorbed on edge plane graphite, the same complexes show good activity for heterogeneous aqueous CO2 reduction with 90% selectivity for CO.Comparative electrochemical studies between covalent and non-covalent modification of the graphite surfaces also were carried out for related Re(I)-tricarbonyl complexes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSummit (Simon Fraser University)→French-language works237,207→