MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7139469733

OSDP project # I-150 final report

2013· report· en· W7139469733 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jessica Dennis, Kelvin C.S. Kou

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2013
Typereport
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiocharLoamCompostCharcoalTemperate climateAmendmentArable landSoil waterSlash-and-charSoil carbon
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Biochar is charcoal made from waste organic materials via pyrolysis that has the potential to improve crop productivity and sequester carbon when applied as a soil amendment. Increased crop yield is frequently reported from biochar-amended fields primarily in tropical and subtropical regions. The UBC research project investigated the effects of biochar as a soil amendment in an organic system located in a temperate climate. A field trial was undertaken at the UBC Farm in Vancouver, British Columbia to assess the impact of incorporating wood-derived biochar at a rate of 10t/ha into an arable loamy sand on beet yield. Beets were grown in 1m² x 19m² (3.5’ x 63') plots that were arranged randomly in blocks with three replicates for each type of the following four treatments: 1) biochar only, 2) compost only, 3) compost and biochar, 4) control (not amended). Total fresh biomass, root mass, shoot mass and number of plants were recorded and analyzed. Pre-and post-trial soil sampling and mid-season foliar sampling were carried out and assessed. The field study also explored the practical side of handling biochar on farm and experience with mechanical spreading is included alongside trial results. Biochar added at 10t/ha to organically managed loamy sand soil in a temperate climate did not impact beet yield, plant nutrient, or soil nutrient levels positively or negatively over one growing season. A slight increase in soil carbon in the biochar containing plots and a slight decrease in the plots without biochar was observed. A higher density of beets was found in the amended plots and it is hypothesized that biochar may have contributed to soil water retention resulting in higher germination or survival of beet seedlings. A second year of research will be carried out to consider the long term impacts of biochar. The initial findings from this trial suggest that the addition of biochar to already productive soils may not have the measureable impacts on yield that have been demonstrated in other regions and soils. Despite no clear yield benefits, no negative impacts were found in this trial, which indicates that biochar applications can still be a valuable soil carbon sequestration strategy in these soils. The potential for long-term benefits of biochar remain to be explored through continued research at UBC Farm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.520
Threshold uncertainty score0.684

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5200.333

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)→French-language works237,207→