MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7139490394

CRS issue brief

2002· report· en· W7139490394 on OpenAlexaff
Jonathan E. Medalia

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas) · 2002
Typereport
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsGlobal Affairs Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSuspectTest (biology)Soviet unionChinaNuclear testArms controlTreaty
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A comprehensive test ban treaty, or CTBT, is the oldest item on the nuclear arms control agenda.Three treaties currently limit testing to underground only, with a maximum force equal to 150,000 tons of TNT.According to the Natural Resources Defense Council, the United States conducted 1,030 nuclear tests, the Soviet Union 715, the United Kingdom 45, France 210, and China 45.The last U.S. test was held in 1992; the last U.K. test, in 1991.Russia claims it has not conducted nuclear tests since 1991, though some suspect it may have conducted several low-yield tests since then.IB92099 03-20-02 CRS-1 MOST RECENT DEVELOPMENTSOn March 14, San Marino became the 90 th nation to ratify the CTBT.On February 14, the Department of Energy conducted its 16th subcritical experiment at the Nevada Test Site, the first with U.K. participation.On January 9, the Administration presented a briefing on the Nuclear Posture Review (NPR), which dealt in part with issues related to nuclear testing.This briefing and subsequent information on the NPR have led to speculation on the prospects for resumed U.S. nuclear testing and debate over the desirability of that course of action.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.532
Threshold uncertainty score0.759

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0090.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0060.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4680.420

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas)French-language works237,207