MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7139498781

Review of <i>The Indian Territory Journals of Colonel RichardIrving Dodge</i> Edited by Wayne R. Kime

2002· article· W7139498781 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Scott Eckberg

Bibliographic record

VenueLincoln (University of Nebraska) · 2002
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCheyenneFrontierOfficerGeorge (robot)MutinyAdventureMilitary history
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Professional soldier, avid sportsman, boisterous raconteur, acute observer: this composite is vividly conveyed in Wayne R. Kime's superbly-edited journals of Lieutenant Colonel Richard Irving Dodge. Written during intervals of intense military activity in 1878-1880, Dodge describes actions that reinforced federal Indian policy on the Great Plains. Ranging from Kansas to Indian Territory, the expanse that later became Oklahoma, Dodge was in his element and at the prime of his career at a significant juncture of frontier Plains history. Dodge served as a field commander during the Northern Cheyenne outbreak and as commanding officer of Cantonment North Fork Canadian River, the six-company outpost he established during 1879 in Indian Territory as a restraint to subsequent Cheyenne and Arapaho movements. As subaltern to the mercurial Colonel Ranald S. Mackenzie during the Ute Campaign of summer 1880, Dodge again demonstrated the abilities that by year's end were recognized in his advancement as aide-de-camp to General of the Army William T. Sherman. During this brief, frenetic period, Dodge's writings capture the rapid change and consequent impact experienced by Great Plains Indians, settlers, and soldiers. He describes the influence of stage and railroad networks, telegraphic and postal communications, and the displacement of bison by domestic cattle. Witnessing depredations committed by Indians along the route of the outbreak and, conversely, the encroachment of settlers and cattlemen on Indian lands, Dodge implied through his observations his frustration over a thinly-stretched army required to be a frontier constabulary yet restrained in authority and jurisdiction. Reflecting the perennial conflict between military and civilian administration of Indian affairs, Dodge is naturally critical of the Indian Bureau, and particularly Indian agent John D. Miles. But he also acknowledges the paucity of congressional funding that the bureau and the army required to assimilate the Plains tribes effectively and secure a changing frontier for Americanization. Dodge's knowledge of and innate sympathy for the tribes' condition compelled completion of a manuscript for his third book, Our Wild Indians, a classic of its time, in 1880. As the editor of two previous editions of Dodge's journals, Wayne R. Kime deftly fleshes out his subject's personality and milieu. His annotating is exhaustive, and each journal is preceded by a commentary interpreting the backdrop of national and regional developments against which Dodge's narrative unfolds. Kime's precise scholarship combines with Dodge's lively account to make this an important addition to Great Plains literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.131

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0110.013
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.028

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLincoln (University of Nebraska)Same topicIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsFrench-language works237,207