The European Neighbourhood Policy: Assessing the EU's Policy toward the Region
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In a relatively short amount of time, the EU has become one of the world's most powerful and important actors on the world stage. Now for the first time this volume explores the goals and effectiveness of the EU's special approach to foreign policy; how its policy is perceived by outsiders and the ramifications of those views; the EU's relations with its neighbors, as well as countries well beyond its borders; and how the EU has and can promote its values abroad. \n \n \n"One of the most comprehensive studies of the EU foreign policy to date. The EU's foreign policy is not an easy subject to tackle, but the contributors do it in an elegant and cogent manner." \n—Luciano Bardi, University of Pisa and President of the European Consortium for Political Research \n \n \nContributors include Irina Angelescu (IHEID, Geneva), Elena Baracani (Italian Institute for Human Sciences), Mara Caira (IULM, Milan), Maurizio Carbone (University of Glasgow), Tom Casier (University of Kent), Natalia Chaban (University of Canterbury), Marta Dassù (Aspen Institute Italia), Khalid Emara (Egyptian Foreign Ministry), Laura C. Ferreira-Pereira (University of Porto), Serena Giusti (ISPI and Catholic University of Milan), Luca Gori (Italian Foreign Ministry), Alberto Heimler (SSPA—Italian Public Administration Graduate School), Martin Holland (University of Canterbury), Joseph S. Joseph (University of Cyprus), Stephan Keukeleire (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven and College of Europe), Finn Laursen (Dalhousie University), Francesca Longo (University of Catania), Roberto Menotti (Aspen Institute Italia), Andrew Moravcsik (Princeton University), Philomena Murray (University of Melbourne), Stefania Panebianco (University of Catania), Tomislava Penkova (ISPI, Milan), Lara Piccardo (University of Genoa), Joaquín Roy (University of Miami), Jeremy Shapiro (Brookings Institution), Alfred Tovias (Hebrew University and Leonard Davis Institute for International Relations), Nicola Verola (Italian Foreign Ministry), Bernard Yvars (University of Montesquieu, Bordeaux).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.014 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.012 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it