MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7139536497

Lone Star Lake 40

2020· article· W7139536497 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Timothy K. Perttula, Robert Z. Selden

Bibliographic record

VenueIndex of Texas Archaeology Open Access Grey Literature from the Lone Star State · 2020
Typearticle
Language
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMineralogy and Gemology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEngravingScrollRed sandstoneNova scotiaVermilion
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SITE NAME OR SITE NUMBER: Lone Star Lake VESSEL NO.: 40 NON-PLASTICS: grog VESSEL FORM: Carinated bowl RIM AND LIP FORM: Direct rim and a rounded lip CORE COLOR: H (fired in a reducing environment and cooled in the open air) INTERIOR SURFACE COLOR: yellowish-brown (10YR 5/4) EXTERIOR SURFACE COLOR: dark gray (10YR 4/1) WALL THICKNESS (RIM, BODY, AND BASE IN MM): 6.3 mm, rim INTERIOR SURFACE TREATMENT: burnished on the rim EXTERIOR SURFACE TREATMENT: burnished HEIGHT (IN CM): 9.3 ORIFICE DIAMETER (IN CM): 20.3 DIAMETER AT BOTTOM OF RIM OR NECK (IN CM): 20.3 BASE DIAMETER (IN CM): 7.0 ESTIMATED VOLUME (IN LITERS): 1.1 liters DECORATION: The rim panel has an engraved scroll motif (Thurmond 1990) repeated four times around the vessel. The scrolls are divided by cross-hatched engraved brackets, and the upper and lower scroll fill zones are filled with a series of near vertical lines. A red clay pigment has also been rubbed in the engraved lines. TYPE: Ripley Engraved, var. Gandy Ripley Engraved, var. Gandy carinated bowl, Lone Star Lake site.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.668
Threshold uncertainty score0.474

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6680.373

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndex of Texas Archaeology Open Access Grey Literature from the Lone Star StateSame topicMineralogy and Gemology StudiesFrench-language works237,207